США изучают ограничения на Ant Group и платежные системы Tencent, 8 октября 2020 г., 3:28 утра

By
В октябре 8, 2020
Теги:

(Bloomberg) — The Trump administration is exploring restrictions on billionaire Jack Ma’s Ant Group as well as Tencent Holdings Ltd. over concerns that their digital payment platforms threaten U.S. national security, according to people familiar with the matter, a move that risks infuriating China and disrupting what could be the world’s largest initial public offering.Debate over how and whether to restrict Ant Group’s and Tencent’s payment systems has accelerated among senior U.S. officials in recent weeks though a final decision isn’t imminent, said the people, who spoke on condition of anonymity about an idea that’s still taking shape.U.S. officials are concerned that Ant Group and other Chinese fintech platforms will come to dominate global digital payments, the people said. That in turn could give China access to banking and personal data of hundreds of millions of people. Senior administration officials discussed the idea in a Sept. 30 meeting in the White House Situation Room, according to two people familiar with the matter.Yet officials acknowledge that it would be difficult to move forward until they sort out the mechanism, and that is proving difficult to do as the officials seek to find a legally sound approach.There’s no indication the idea has been presented to President Donald Trump, whose approval would be required to proceed, two of the people said. The president fell ill with coronavirus a day after officials met to discuss China, and the issue hasn’t made much progress at such a senior level in the days since, one of the people said.The internal discussions come as Ant, the online finance giant and owner of the Alipay e-payment system, nears a dual listing in Shanghai and Hong Kong, possibly by the end of the month. An affiliate of Chinese tech giant Alibaba Group Holding Ltd., Ant is preparing for an IPO of about $35 billion that would give it an overall valuation of $250 billion, twice that of Citigroup Inc.Major EscalationAnt Group said in a statement that it unaware of any administration discussions and that its “business is primarily in China and we are excited about our growth prospects in the China market.”Tencent didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment. Communications staff for the White House, Treasury Department and State Department declined to comment. Соединенные штаты Trade Representative’s office and Commerce Department also didn’t immediately reply to requests for comment.Imposing restrictions on Ant Group — a crown jewel of the world’s second-largest economy — would mark a major escalation in the Trump administration’s economic and political confrontation with Beijing. Since Trump took office, the U.S. has taken aim at Chinese success stories including ByteDance Ltd.’s TikTok video app and Huawei Technologies Co.The U.S. discussions are sure to cast a shadow over the Ant Group share sale, where many investors are lining up to invest billions of dollars. Restrictions would also impact U.S. investors who have already sunk millions of dollars into Ant. In 2018, Silver Lake Management LLC, Warburg Pincus LLC, and Carlyle Group Inc. invested at least $500 million each in the financial technology giant, people familiar with the matter said at the time.There’s an incentive to act now, with the U.S. election approaching: embed as many restrictions against China as possible in the hopes that some of them will stick if Democratic nominee Joe Biden carries his current lead in national polls into a victory next month over Trump.Discussions around Ant Group’s and Tencent’s payment platforms have been held up in part by debate over what authority the government would use to restrict the companies, and how quickly any measures could be implemented. It’s deemed unlikely by U.S. officials that measures could be ready before the Nov. 3 election, and there are concerns that the actions could be swatted down in court.One option would be to use authorities granted under a 2019 order to protect the digital supply chain, though that would likely add weeks to the administration’s timeline. A speedier alternative would be to draft a new executive order along the lines of the presidential directives banning ByteDance’s TikTok and Tencent’s WeChat messaging app.That course has its risks. Courts have recently granted injunctions halting the administration’s bids to ban TikTok and WeChat, saying the White House may have exceeded its authority and granting a temporary reprieve to the apps from being removed from U.S. digital stores.Yet one official said the administration thinks it would have an easier time in the courts if it went that route because, while the TikTok and Wechat bans were challenged on free-speech grounds, there would be no such concern with Alipay and the Tencent payment services.Another potentially more damaging possibility is putting Ant Group and Tencent on the Treasury Department’s specially designated national list, a move that would make them all but radioactive for any U.S. company — and possibly overseas firms — to do business with them.Any significant move against Ant Group risks provoking Beijing far more than previous U.S. measures, even those aimed at TikTok. It would likely fuel suspicions that the U.S. is not interested in data security but instead wants to hold back innovative Chinese companies that have far surpassed anything Silicon Valley has to offer.Alipay is woven into the fabric of Chinese society, providing services from wealth management and insurance to credit checks and consumer loans. If U.S. buyers purchase items from its affiliate Alibaba, their identity and private data could be collected.Retreat from U.S.That said Ant retreated from expansions in the U.S., in tandem with Alibaba, after U.S.-China tensions escalated. According to its IPO prospectus, Ant gets less than 5% of its revenue from outside China. And only a tiny portion of that is from the U.S., according to a person familiar with the matter.Investors in Alibaba took that into account. The company’s shares remained largely flat in Hong Kong trading, while those rose 1.4% in the U.S.The sanctions idea originated with administration officials who favor a hard line toward Beijing — especially in Secretary of State Michael Pompeo’s State Department. They argue that China’s ruling Communist Party wants access to user data from around the world through companies that have grown increasingly powerful on the global stage.Those concerns echo administration arguments that telecommunications equipment maker Huawei’s rush into 5G mobile networks creates a worldwide security risk. НАС officials say that firms such as Ant, Tencent and Huawei are complicit in what U.S. officials have previously characterized as the technological repression of the Chinese people, claims those companies and China’s government have rejected.The idea of restricting Ant has been championed from the State Department, where advisers are pressing a “Clean Network” initiative. In August, as part of that effort, Pompeo unveiled new guidance warning against using Chinese 5G equipment, undersea cables and cloud-computing software.The public element of that initiative didn’t focus on digital payments but officials have privately discussed the idea of a “clean currency” system that would purge Chinese firms from online payments. The administration has also been emboldened by its anti-Huawei campaign, which it credits with pressuring many European countries to effectively ban the company’s equipment from their 5G networks.“Freedom-loving nations must come together to confront the CCP’s aggressive behavior,” Pompeo told reporters in August about the Clean Network plan.

U.S. Explores Curbs on Ant Group, Tencent Payment Systems(Bloomberg) — The Trump administration is exploring restrictions on billionaire Jack Ma’s Ant Group as well as Tencent Holdings Ltd. over concerns that their digital payment platforms threaten U.S. national security, according to people familiar with the matter, a move that risks infuriating China and disrupting what could be the world’s largest initial public offering.Debate over how and whether to restrict Ant Group’s and Tencent’s payment systems has accelerated among senior U.S. officials in recent weeks though a final decision isn’t imminent, said the people, who spoke on condition of anonymity about an idea that’s still taking shape.U.S. officials are concerned that Ant Group and other Chinese fintech platforms will come to dominate global digital payments, the people said. That in turn could give China access to banking and personal data of hundreds of millions of people. Senior administration officials discussed the idea in a Sept. 30 meeting in the White House Situation Room, according to two people familiar with the matter.Yet officials acknowledge that it would be difficult to move forward until they sort out the mechanism, and that is proving difficult to do as the officials seek to find a legally sound approach.There’s no indication the idea has been presented to President Donald Trump, whose approval would be required to proceed, two of the people said. The president fell ill with coronavirus a day after officials met to discuss China, and the issue hasn’t made much progress at such a senior level in the days since, one of the people said.The internal discussions come as Ant, the online finance giant and owner of the Alipay e-payment system, nears a dual listing in Shanghai and Hong Kong, possibly by the end of the month. An affiliate of Chinese tech giant Alibaba Group Holding Ltd., Ant is preparing for an IPO of about $35 billion that would give it an overall valuation of $250 billion, twice that of Citigroup Inc.Major EscalationAnt Group said in a statement that it unaware of any administration discussions and that its “business is primarily in China and we are excited about our growth prospects in the China market.”Tencent didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment. Communications staff for the White House, Treasury Department and State Department declined to comment. Соединенные штаты Trade Representative’s office and Commerce Department also didn’t immediately reply to requests for comment.Imposing restrictions on Ant Group — a crown jewel of the world’s second-largest economy — would mark a major escalation in the Trump administration’s economic and political confrontation with Beijing. Since Trump took office, the U.S. has taken aim at Chinese success stories including ByteDance Ltd.’s TikTok video app and Huawei Technologies Co.The U.S. discussions are sure to cast a shadow over the Ant Group share sale, where many investors are lining up to invest billions of dollars. Restrictions would also impact U.S. investors who have already sunk millions of dollars into Ant. In 2018, Silver Lake Management LLC, Warburg Pincus LLC, and Carlyle Group Inc. invested at least $500 million each in the financial technology giant, people familiar with the matter said at the time.There’s an incentive to act now, with the U.S. election approaching: embed as many restrictions against China as possible in the hopes that some of them will stick if Democratic nominee Joe Biden carries his current lead in national polls into a victory next month over Trump.Discussions around Ant Group’s and Tencent’s payment platforms have been held up in part by debate over what authority the government would use to restrict the companies, and how quickly any measures could be implemented. It’s deemed unlikely by U.S. officials that measures could be ready before the Nov. 3 election, and there are concerns that the actions could be swatted down in court.One option would be to use authorities granted under a 2019 order to protect the digital supply chain, though that would likely add weeks to the administration’s timeline. A speedier alternative would be to draft a new executive order along the lines of the presidential directives banning ByteDance’s TikTok and Tencent’s WeChat messaging app.That course has its risks. Courts have recently granted injunctions halting the administration’s bids to ban TikTok and WeChat, saying the White House may have exceeded its authority and granting a temporary reprieve to the apps from being removed from U.S. digital stores.Yet one official said the administration thinks it would have an easier time in the courts if it went that route because, while the TikTok and Wechat bans were challenged on free-speech grounds, there would be no such concern with Alipay and the Tencent payment services.Another potentially more damaging possibility is putting Ant Group and Tencent on the Treasury Department’s specially designated national list, a move that would make them all but radioactive for any U.S. company — and possibly overseas firms — to do business with them.Any significant move against Ant Group risks provoking Beijing far more than previous U.S. measures, even those aimed at TikTok. It would likely fuel suspicions that the U.S. is not interested in data security but instead wants to hold back innovative Chinese companies that have far surpassed anything Silicon Valley has to offer.Alipay is woven into the fabric of Chinese society, providing services from wealth management and insurance to credit checks and consumer loans. If U.S. buyers purchase items from its affiliate Alibaba, their identity and private data could be collected.Retreat from U.S.That said Ant retreated from expansions in the U.S., in tandem with Alibaba, after U.S.-China tensions escalated. According to its IPO prospectus, Ant gets less than 5% of its revenue from outside China. And only a tiny portion of that is from the U.S., according to a person familiar with the matter.Investors in Alibaba took that into account. The company’s shares remained largely flat in Hong Kong trading, while those rose 1.4% in the U.S.The sanctions idea originated with administration officials who favor a hard line toward Beijing — especially in Secretary of State Michael Pompeo’s State Department. They argue that China’s ruling Communist Party wants access to user data from around the world through companies that have grown increasingly powerful on the global stage.Those concerns echo administration arguments that telecommunications equipment maker Huawei’s rush into 5G mobile networks creates a worldwide security risk. НАС officials say that firms such as Ant, Tencent and Huawei are complicit in what U.S. officials have previously characterized as the technological repression of the Chinese people, claims those companies and China’s government have rejected.The idea of restricting Ant has been championed from the State Department, where advisers are pressing a “Clean Network” initiative. In August, as part of that effort, Pompeo unveiled new guidance warning against using Chinese 5G equipment, undersea cables and cloud-computing software.The public element of that initiative didn’t focus on digital payments but officials have privately discussed the idea of a “clean currency” system that would purge Chinese firms from online payments. The administration has also been emboldened by its anti-Huawei campaign, which it credits with pressuring many European countries to effectively ban the company’s equipment from their 5G networks.“Freedom-loving nations must come together to confront the CCP’s aggressive behavior,” Pompeo told reporters in August about the Clean Network plan.

,

Мгновенное предложение

Введите биржевой символ.

Выберите Обмен.

Выберите тип безопасности.

Пожалуйста, введите свое Имя.

Пожалуйста, введите свою фамилию.

Пожалуйста, введите свой номер телефона.

Пожалуйста, введите Ваш адрес электронной почты.

Пожалуйста, введите или выберите общее количество принадлежащих вам акций.

Пожалуйста, введите или выберите желаемую сумму кредита, которую вы ищете.

Пожалуйста, выберите Цель кредита.

Пожалуйста, выберите, являетесь ли вы должностным лицом/директором.

High West Capital Partners, LLC может предлагать определенную информацию только лицам, которые являются «Аккредитованными инвесторами» и/или «Квалифицированными клиентами», как эти термины определены в соответствии с применимыми федеральными законами о ценных бумагах. Чтобы стать «Аккредитованным инвестором» и/или «Квалифицированным клиентом», вы должны соответствовать критериям, указанным в ОДНОЙ ИЛИ НЕСКОЛЬКИХ из следующих категорий/пунктов, пронумерованных от 1 до 20 ниже.

High West Capital Partners, LLC не может предоставить вам какую-либо информацию о своих кредитных программах или инвестиционных продуктах, если вы не соответствуете одному или нескольким из следующих критериев. Кроме того, иностранные граждане, которые могут быть освобождены от квалификации аккредитованного инвестора США, по-прежнему должны соответствовать установленным критериям в соответствии с внутренней кредитной политикой High West Capital Partners, LLC. High West Capital Partners, LLC не будет предоставлять информацию или кредитовать какое-либо физическое и/или юридическое лицо, которое не соответствует одному или нескольким из следующих критериев:

1) Физическое лицо, чей собственный капитал превышает 1.0 миллиона долларов США. Физическое лицо (не юридическое лицо), чей собственный капитал или совместный собственный капитал с его или ее супругом на момент покупки превышает 1,000,000 XNUMX XNUMX долларов США. (При расчете собственного капитала вы можете включить свой капитал в личное имущество и недвижимость, включая ваше основное место жительства, денежные средства, краткосрочные инвестиции, акции и ценные бумаги. Включение вашего капитала в личное имущество и недвижимость должно основываться на справедливой оценке собственного капитала. рыночная стоимость такого имущества за вычетом долга, обеспеченного таким имуществом.)

2) Физическое лицо с индивидуальным годовым доходом в размере 200,000 200,000 долларов США. Физическое лицо (не юридическое лицо), которое имело индивидуальный доход более XNUMX XNUMX долларов США в каждом из двух предыдущих календарных лет и имеет обоснованные ожидания достижения того же уровня дохода в текущем году.

3) Физическое лицо с совместным годовым доходом в размере 300,000 300,000 долларов США. Физическое лицо (не юридическое лицо), которое имело совместный доход со своим супругом, превышающий XNUMX XNUMX долларов США в каждом из предыдущих двух календарных лет, и имеет обоснованные ожидания достижения того же уровня дохода в текущем году.

4) Корпорации или партнерства. Корпорация, партнерство или подобная организация, активы которой превышают 5 миллионов долларов США и не были созданы с конкретной целью приобретения доли в Корпорации или Партнерстве.

5) Отзывной траст. Траст, который может быть отозван его учредителями, и каждый из доверителей которого является Аккредитованным инвестором, как это определено в одной или нескольких других категориях/пунктах, пронумерованных в настоящем документе.

6) Безотзывный траст. Траст (кроме плана ERISA), который (a) не подлежит отзыву его учредителями, (b) имеет активы на сумму более 5 миллионов долларов США, (c) не был создан для конкретной цели приобретения доли, и (d ) управляется лицом, обладающим такими знаниями и опытом в финансовых и деловых вопросах, что такое лицо способно оценить преимущества и риски инвестиций в траст.

7) IRA или аналогичный план льгот. План льгот IRA, Keogh или аналогичный, который распространяется только на одно физическое лицо, которое является Аккредитованным инвестором, как определено в одной или нескольких других категориях/пунктах, пронумерованных здесь.

8) Счет плана пособий работникам, ориентированного на участников. План вознаграждений сотрудников, ориентированный на участников, инвестирующий по указанию и за счет участника, который является Аккредитованным инвестором, как этот термин определен в одной или нескольких других категориях/пунктах, пронумерованных в настоящем документе.

9) Другой план ERISA. План вознаграждений работникам в значении Раздела I Закона ERISA, за исключением плана, ориентированного на участников, с общими активами, превышающими 5 миллионов долларов США или по которому инвестиционные решения (включая решение о покупке доли) принимаются банком, зарегистрированным инвестиционный консультант, сберегательная и кредитная ассоциация или страховая компания.

10) План государственных пособий. План, созданный и поддерживаемый штатом, муниципалитетом или любым агентством штата или муниципалитета в интересах своих сотрудников, с общими активами, превышающими 5 миллионов долларов США.

11) Некоммерческая организация. Организация, описанная в разделе 501(c)(3) Налогового кодекса с поправками, с общими активами, превышающими 5 миллионов долларов США (включая пожертвования, аннуитеты и фонды пожизненного дохода), как показано в последней проверенной финансовой отчетности организации. .

12) Банк, как он определен в разделе 3(a)(2) Закона о ценных бумагах (действующий за свой счет или в качестве фидуциара).

13) Сберегательно-ссудная ассоциация или аналогичное учреждение, как это определено в Разделе 3(a)(5)(A) Закона о ценных бумагах (действующее за свой счет или в качестве фидуциара).

14) Брокер-дилер, зарегистрированный в соответствии с Законом о биржах.

15) Страховая компания, как это определено в статье 2(13) Закона о ценных бумагах.

16) «Компания по развитию бизнеса», как это определено в разделе 2(a)(48) Закона об инвестиционных компаниях.

17) Инвестиционная компания малого бизнеса, имеющая лицензию в соответствии с разделом 301 (c) или (d) Закона об инвестициях в малый бизнес 1958 года.

18) «Частная компания по развитию бизнеса», как это определено в статье 202(a)(22) Закона о консультантах.

19) Исполнительный директор или директор. Физическое лицо, которое является исполнительным должностным лицом, директором или генеральным партнером Партнерства или Генерального партнера и является Аккредитованным инвестором, как этот термин определен в одной или нескольких категориях/пунктах, пронумерованных в настоящем документе.

20) Организация, полностью принадлежащая аккредитованным инвесторам. Корпорация, товарищество, частная инвестиционная компания или подобная организация, каждый из владельцев акций которой является физическим лицом, являющимся Аккредитованным инвестором, как этот термин определен в одной или нескольких категориях/пунктах, пронумерованных в настоящем документе.

Пожалуйста, прочитайте уведомление выше и установите флажок ниже, чтобы продолжить.

Сингапур

+65 3105 1295

Тайвань

Скоро будет!

Гонконге

Р91, 3-й этаж,
Итон Тауэр, Хисан Авеню, 8.
Козуэй Бэй, Гонконг
+852 3002 4462

Охват рынка